[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zfuofzld.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:43:58 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>, dianders@...omium.org,
liusong@...ux.alibaba.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com,
kernelfans@...il.com, deller@....de, npiggin@...il.com,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 4/4] watchdog/softlockup: report the most frequent
interrupts
On Wed, Mar 06 2024 at 20:52, Bitao Hu wrote:
> + if (__this_cpu_read(snapshot_taken)) {
> + for_each_active_irq(i) {
> + count = kstat_get_irq_since_snapshot(i);
> + tabulate_irq_count(irq_counts_sorted, i, count, NUM_HARDIRQ_REPORT);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We do not want the "watchdog: " prefix on every line,
> + * hence we use "printk" instead of "pr_crit".
> + */
You are not providing any justification why the prefix is not
wanted. Just saying 'We do not want' does not cut it and who is 'We'. I
certainly not.
I really disagree because the prefixes are very useful for searching log
files. So not having it makes it harder to filter out for no reason.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists