lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <059d03a5da257660fa0bc188c6cc8d0152e97704.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:39:39 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Yoshinori Sato
	 <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned
 data"

Hi Guenter,

On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 16:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> This reverts commit cadc4e1a2b4d20d0cc0e81f2c6ba0588775e54e5.
> 
> Commit cadc4e1a2b4d ("sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned
> data") causes bad checksum calculations on unaligned data. Reverting
> it fixes the problem.
> 
>     # Subtest: checksum
>     # module: checksum_kunit
>     1..5
>     # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:500
>     Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
>         ( u64)result == 53378 (0xd082)
>         ( u64)expec == 33488 (0x82d0)
>     # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>     not ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
>     # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:525
>     Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
>         ( u64)result == 65281 (0xff01)
>         ( u64)expec == 65280 (0xff00)
>     # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>     not ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
>     # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:573
>     Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
>         ( u64)result == 65535 (0xffff)
>         ( u64)expec == 65534 (0xfffe)
>     # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>     not ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs
>     # test_ip_fast_csum: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
>     ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
>     # test_csum_ipv6_magic: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
>     ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
>  # checksum: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
>  # Totals: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
> not ok 22 checksum

Can you tell me how the tests are run so I can try to verify this on real hardware?

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ