lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9ac59cd-82db-45a0-9f85-ec3880c54dbf@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:34:00 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
 Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned
 data"

On 3/25/24 00:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 16:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> This reverts commit cadc4e1a2b4d20d0cc0e81f2c6ba0588775e54e5.
>>
>> Commit cadc4e1a2b4d ("sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned
>> data") causes bad checksum calculations on unaligned data. Reverting
>> it fixes the problem.
>>
>>      # Subtest: checksum
>>      # module: checksum_kunit
>>      1..5
>>      # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:500
>>      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
>>          ( u64)result == 53378 (0xd082)
>>          ( u64)expec == 33488 (0x82d0)
>>      # test_csum_fixed_random_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>>      not ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
>>      # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:525
>>      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
>>          ( u64)result == 65281 (0xff01)
>>          ( u64)expec == 65280 (0xff00)
>>      # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>>      not ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
>>      # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:573
>>      Expected ( u64)result == ( u64)expec, but
>>          ( u64)result == 65535 (0xffff)
>>          ( u64)expec == 65534 (0xfffe)
>>      # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
>>      not ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs
>>      # test_ip_fast_csum: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
>>      ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
>>      # test_csum_ipv6_magic: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1
>>      ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
>>   # checksum: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
>>   # Totals: pass:2 fail:3 skip:0 total:5
>> not ok 22 checksum
> 
> Can you tell me how the tests are run so I can try to verify this on real hardware?
> 

Enabling CONFIG_KUNIT and CHECKSUM_KUNIT and booting with those tests enabled
should do it.

Thanks,
Guenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ