linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/451] 6.1.83-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuFh7K4XO+hVyJ59vWbfCaGpNf1ko9bUaZ0qV86wLbreQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:11:50 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, 
	shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, 
	florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, pavel@...x.de, 
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, 
	clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/451] 6.1.83-rc1 review

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 04:42, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.83 release.
> There are 451 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue Mar 26 11:11:59 PM UTC 2024.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-6.1.y&id2=v6.1.82
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> Thanks,
> Sasha

The regression detected while building allmodconfig builds with clang-17
failed on all the architectures. But gcc-12 builds passed.

> Andrii Nakryiko (5):
>   libbpf: Fix faccessat() usage on Android
>   libbpf: Add missing LIBBPF_API annotation to libbpf_set_memlock_rlim
>     API
>   selftests/bpf: Convert test_global_funcs test to test_loader framework
>   selftests/bpf: Add global subprog context passing tests
>   bpf: don't infer PTR_TO_CTX for programs with unnamed context type

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Build error:
------------
kernel/bpf/btf.c:5140:10: error: expression which evaluates to zero
treated as a null pointer constant of type 'const struct btf_member *'
[-Werror,-Wnon-literal-null-conversion]
 5140 |                 return false;
      |                        ^~~~~
1 error generated.
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: kernel/bpf/btf.o] Error 1h

Steps to reproduce:
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain clang-17
--kconfig allmodconfig LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1

Links:
 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.82-451-ga5b0d68e1b0f/testrun/23155982/suite/build/test/clang-17-allmodconfig/log
 - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2eAPAL6GZr1JrCuFjUfBrCjccbe/
 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.82-451-ga5b0d68e1b0f/testrun/23155982/suite/build/test/clang-17-allmodconfig/history/

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org