[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgFTtAOw39tIyfzR@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:36:36 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, qyousef@...alina.io,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vschneid@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Minor changes for rd->overload access
* Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> v2 -> v3:
> - Wrapped check for value change inside ser_rd_overload_status
> as suggested by Qais.
> - Added reviewed-by tags.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - dropped Fixes tag.
> - Added one of the perf probes in the changelog for reference.
> - Added reviewed-by tags.
>
> tl;dr
> When running workloads in large systems, it was observed that access to
> rd->overload was taking time. It would be better to check the value
> before updating since value changes less often. Patch 1/2 does that.
> With patch updates happen only if necessary. CPU Bus traffic reduced a
> bit. No significant gains in workload performance.
Could you please post this against the latest scheduler tree, ie. tip:sched/core?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists