[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d9a093e-ee4f-4f4d-8883-e17dc8dc8210@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:30:26 +0800
From: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <rfoss@...nel.org>,
<todor.too@...il.com>, <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<mchehab@...nel.org>, <quic_yon@...cinc.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] media: qcom: camss: Add new params for csid_device
Hi Krzysztof,
On 3/20/2024 11:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/03/2024 15:11, Depeng Shao wrote:
>> CSID gen3 has a new register block which is named as
>> CSID top, it controls the output of CSID, since the
>> CSID can connect to SFE or original VFE in CSID gen3.
>> The register update is moved to CSID from VFE in CSID
>> gen3.
>> So, adding top_base and reg_update variables in csid
>> device structure for CSID gen3.
>
> Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
> process (neither too early nor over the limit):
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597
>
Thanks, will update it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.h | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.h b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.h
>> index 4a9e5a2d1f92..ca654b007441 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.h
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.h
>> @@ -162,7 +162,9 @@ struct csid_device {
>> struct v4l2_subdev subdev;
>> struct media_pad pads[MSM_CSID_PADS_NUM];
>> void __iomem *base;
>> + void __iomem *top_base;
>> u32 irq;
>> + u32 reg_update;
>> char irq_name[30];
>
> This is pointless. The are no users of this!
>
> Sorry, don't add random code here or there without concept.
>
For the old code, they are new concept, since it is new block in the
hardware, I just want to highlight them.
But thanks for the comment, will update the code based on your comment.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Depeng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists