lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240326140533.a0d0041371e21540dd934722@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:05:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Soma Nakata <soma.nakata01@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap: set folio->mapping to NULL before
 xas_store()

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:04:54 +0900 Soma Nakata <soma.nakata01@...il.com> wrote:

> Functions such as __filemap_get_folio() check the truncation of
> folios based on the mapping field. Therefore setting this field to NULL
> earlier prevents unnecessary operations on already removed folios.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -139,11 +139,12 @@ static void page_cache_delete(struct address_space *mapping,
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
>  
> +	folio->mapping = NULL;
> +	/* Leave page->index set: truncation lookup relies upon it */
> +
>  	xas_store(&xas, shadow);
>  	xas_init_marks(&xas);
>  
> -	folio->mapping = NULL;
> -	/* Leave page->index set: truncation lookup relies upon it */
>  	mapping->nrpages -= nr;
>  }

Seems at least harmless, but I wonder if it can really make any
difference.  Don't readers of folio->mapping lock the folio first?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ