[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <387a04c3-356e-4248-9cd3-7aa1a617c221@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:05:47 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] selftests/dmabuf-heap: conform test to TAP format
output
On 3/4/24 23:08, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
> functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
>
> Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
> ---
> Changes since v4:
> - close fds correctly with code changes added in v3
>
> Chanages since v3:
> - abort test-case instead of exiting if heap/mem allocation fails
> - Correct test_alloc_zeroed() test case in case of failure
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Minor improvements in test_alloc_zeroed() results
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Update some more error handling code
t would be nice to improve the error messages in addition to
changing them over to TAP format. Please see below:
> ---
> .../selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c | 246 +++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
> index 890a8236a8ba7..e7bd03e0af2ea 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
> #include <linux/dma-heap.h>
> #include <drm/drm.h>
> +#include "../kselftest.h"
>
> #define DEVPATH "/dev/dma_heap"
>
> @@ -90,14 +91,13 @@ static int dmabuf_heap_open(char *name)
> char buf[256];
>
> ret = snprintf(buf, 256, "%s/%s", DEVPATH, name);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - printf("snprintf failed!\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret < 0)
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("snprintf failed!\n");
Why not include the return value in the message?
>
> fd = open(buf, O_RDWR);
> if (fd < 0)
> - printf("open %s failed!\n", buf);
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("open %s failed: %s\n", buf, strerror(errno));
> +
> return fd;
> }
>
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int dmabuf_sync(int fd, int start_stop)
>
> #define ONE_MEG (1024 * 1024)
>
> -static int test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
> +static void test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
> {
> int heap_fd = -1, dmabuf_fd = -1, importer_fd = -1;
> uint32_t handle = 0;
> @@ -148,27 +148,19 @@ static int test_alloc_and_import(char *heap_name)
> int ret;
>
> heap_fd = dmabuf_heap_open(heap_name);
> - if (heap_fd < 0)
> - return -1;
>
> - printf(" Testing allocation and importing: ");
> + ksft_print_msg("Testing allocation and importing:\n");
> ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc(heap_fd, ONE_MEG, 0, &dmabuf_fd);
> if (ret) {
> - printf("FAIL (Allocation Failed!)\n");
> - ret = -1;
> - goto out;
> + ksft_test_result_fail("FAIL (Allocation Failed!)\n");
Same here/
> + return;
> }
> +
> /* mmap and write a simple pattern */
> - p = mmap(NULL,
> - ONE_MEG,
> - PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> - MAP_SHARED,
> - dmabuf_fd,
> - 0);
> + p = mmap(NULL, ONE_MEG, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, dmabuf_fd, 0);
> if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> - printf("FAIL (mmap() failed)\n");
> - ret = -1;
> - goto out;
> + ksft_test_result_fail("FAIL (mmap() failed)\n");
Same here and the rest of the changes in this patch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists