[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgLXQ0P8aDl4Xh21@zx2c4.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:10:11 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudan Landge <sudanl@...zon.com>, tytso@....edu, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, graf@...zon.de, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
bchalios@...zon.es, xmarcalx@...zon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] virt: vmgenid: add support for devicetree bindings
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:51:25PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> This is clearly some abandoned driver... sigh... I thought we get rid of
> all this owner crap. Many years ago. How could it appear back if
> automated tools report it?
>
> Considering how many failures LKP reported for your patchsets, I have
> real doubts that anyone actually tests this code.
Now you're commenting on the context rather than the patch.
No, this isn't an abandoned driver, no it's not untested. Rather, it's
code I maintain, care deeply about, and have a tree that receives quite
a bit of testing (random.git) where I'll be taking these OF patches in
the case that this patchset improves (and thanks very much for your
review on it; I'll be appreciative of your ack whenever/if ever it
improves to that point), and if you have other cleanups like removing
owner, please don't hesitate to send a patch.
That all is to say, I'm following these threads closely and care.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists