[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00b1703a-47d7-4dc1-a3cd-f07f1a24db92@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:42:55 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
CC: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
<keescook@...omium.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM ATHEROS ATH10K WIRELESS
DRIVER" <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: allocate dummy net_device dynamically
On 3/27/2024 7:45 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:38:05 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
>> -void init_dummy_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
>> +void init_dummy_netdev_core(struct net_device *dev)
>
> Can init_dummy_netdev_core() be a static function (and no export)?
> alloc_netdev_dummy() is probably going to be the only user.
>
> I'd also lean towards squashing the two commits into one.
And once all of the conversions are complete, won't init_dummy_netdev() no
longer be used and can be removed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists