linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 033/238] md: implement ->set_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7SjGBejv11oCrX-njZ_WfyzXFc7x8X0beBRW_D3H1Ysg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:50:29 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Li Nan <linan666@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 033/238] md: implement ->set_read_only to hook into
 BLKROSET processing

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:18 PM Li Nan <linan666@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> 在 2024/3/26 16:46, Song Liu 写道:
> > Hi Li Nan,
> >
> > Could you please look into this (back port 9674f54e41ff to older stable
> > kernels)? If there is no clean back port, I would recommend we not do
> > the back port.
> >
>
> There are some conflicts to back port, which are not related to the
> modification of this patch. If necessary, let me know and I can adapt and
> send it :)

I think it is not necessary to back port this to older kernels with conflicts.
The error case exists theoretically. But we never got a bug report for it.

Thanks,
Song