linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,qcm6490: Add qcm6490 snd qcs6490 sound card

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:16:25 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>,
 srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, bgoswami@...cinc.com, broonie@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, andersson@...nel.org,
 konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com,
 quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,qcm6490: Add qcm6490 snd
 qcs6490 sound card

On 27/03/2024 12:32, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> Document bindings for the Qualcomm qcm6490 and qcs6490 SoC sound card.
> The bindings are the same as for other newer Qualcomm ADSP sound cards,
> thus keep them in existing qcom,sm8250.yaml file, even though Linux driver
> is separate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> index 2ab6871e89e5..247ad3d10933 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ properties:
>        - enum:
>            - qcom,apq8016-sbc-sndcard
>            - qcom,msm8916-qdsp6-sndcard
> +          - qcom,qcm6490-sndcard
> +          - qcom,qcs6490-sndcard

What are the differences between these sound cards? I know that we ask
for specific compatibles per each SoC block, but for similar SoCs sound
cards might be an exception. It's more of a software construct anyway.

Best regards,
Krzysztof