[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c807c633-c29f-4216-8a53-e0bfa16e6f24@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:16:25 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, bgoswami@...cinc.com, broonie@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com,
quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,qcm6490: Add qcm6490 snd
qcs6490 sound card
On 27/03/2024 12:32, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> Document bindings for the Qualcomm qcm6490 and qcs6490 SoC sound card.
> The bindings are the same as for other newer Qualcomm ADSP sound cards,
> thus keep them in existing qcom,sm8250.yaml file, even though Linux driver
> is separate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> index 2ab6871e89e5..247ad3d10933 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ properties:
> - enum:
> - qcom,apq8016-sbc-sndcard
> - qcom,msm8916-qdsp6-sndcard
> + - qcom,qcm6490-sndcard
> + - qcom,qcs6490-sndcard
What are the differences between these sound cards? I know that we ask
for specific compatibles per each SoC block, but for similar SoCs sound
cards might be an exception. It's more of a software construct anyway.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists