[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3dbb428f-0265-4741-a28e-5613799133e9@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:22:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, bgoswami@...cinc.com, broonie@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com,
quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ASoC: qcom: qcm6490: Add machine driver for
qcm6490
On 27/03/2024 12:32, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> +
> +static int qcm6490_snd_hw_free(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> +{
> + struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data;
> + struct qcm6490_snd_data *data = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(rtd->card);
> + struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = snd_soc_rtd_to_cpu(rtd, 0);
> + struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime = data->sruntime[cpu_dai->id];
> +
> + return qcom_snd_sdw_hw_free(substream, sruntime,
> + &data->stream_prepared[cpu_dai->id]);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct snd_soc_ops qcm6490_be_ops = {
> + .hw_params = qcm6490_snd_hw_params,
> + .hw_free = qcm6490_snd_hw_free,
> + .prepare = qcm6490_snd_prepare,
> +};
I think you leak sdw_stream, because of missing shutdown.
Except that everything looks like sc8280xp, except the snd_init(), so I
wonder how important that difference is? Cannot be combined into sc8280xp?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists