linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] regressions documentation improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240328194342.11760-1-balejk@matfyz.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:29:14 +0100
From: Karel Balej <balejk@...fyz.cz>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org
Cc: balejk@...fyz.cz
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] regressions documentation improvements

Hello,

this small series suggests two (hopefully) improvements for the
regressions-related documentation texts.

The first one is perhaps unnecessarily nitpicky but if nothing else, it
at least adds a missing word.

The other one tries to clarify for future readers a question which was
on my mind through the whole process during my first attempt at
reporting a regression.

Please take a look, I am eager to hear what you think.

Thank you, kind regards,
K. B.

Karel Balej (2):
  docs: *-regressions.rst: unify quoting, add missing word
  docs: handling-regressions.rst: clarify that "Closes:" tags work too

 .../admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst     | 10 +++---
 .../process/handling-regressions.rst          | 32 ++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

-- 
2.44.0