linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix selftests/mm build without requiring "make headers"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d82298b-b17b-440a-beef-590177d0ff50@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:02:37 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@...cker.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix selftests/mm build without requiring "make
 headers"

On 3/28/24 8:34 AM, John Hubbard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As mentioned in each patch, this implements the solution that we discussed in
> December 2023, in [1]. This turned out to be very clean and easy. It should also
> be quite easy to maintain.
There is another way. The headers should be built automatically by make
dependency. The topmost make file always builds headers before building
kselftest i.e., make kselftest

The tools/testing/selftests/Makefile and others Makefiles in test suites
should be updated to build the headers as well. This used to be the
behavior until there were un-resolvable bugs in the Makefiles and it was
reverted:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1657614127.git.guillaume.tucker@collabora.com/

We should come up with the revert of this series such that all the
different scenarios are covered instead of yet again a new solution;
resorting to the duplication of header files or any sort of duplication.

> 
> This should also make Peter Zijlstra happy, because it directly addresses the
> root cause of his "NAK NAK NAK" reply [2]. :)
> 
> I haven't done much build testing, because selftests are not so easy to build
> with a cross-compiler. So it's just tested on x86 64-bit so far.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/783a4178-1dec-4e30-989a-5174b8176b09@redhat.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231103121652.GA6217@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
> 
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> John Hubbard (2):
>   selftests: break the dependency upon local header files
>   selftests/mm: fix additional build errors for selftests
> 
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/memfd.h       |  39 +++
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h | 386 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk         |   9 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile    |   2 +-
>  4 files changed, 435 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/include/uapi/linux/memfd.h
>  create mode 100644 tools/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> 
> 
> base-commit: 98560e9019851bf55b8a4073978a623a3bcf98c0

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum