[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aed9c6f0-a33f-4d2d-ad5c-2a5589483afa@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:45:28 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Mihai Sain <mihai.sain@...rochip.com>, robh@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, lgirdwood@...il.com,
andrei.simion@...rochip.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] regulator: mcp16502: Update the names from buck
regulators
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:28:49PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:17:24PM +0200, Mihai Sain wrote:
> > Use generic names for buck regulators to avoid any confusion.
> > Update the names from buck regulators in order to match
> > the datasheet block diagram for the buck regulators.
> I know the regulator core will create dummy regulators when they are not
> provided in the devicetree, so I am not 100% on how backwards
> compatibility works here.
> You'll end up with a bunch of dummies and therefore the regulator-names
> and constraints on the regulator will be lost, no?
> Can you explain how is this backwards compatible with the old
> devicetrees?
It quite simply isn't backwards compatible. The original driver looks
to be pretty broken but this breaks compatibility, we'd need a
transition plan of some kind which probably needs some core work to cope
with fallback names.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists