lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240328134634.350592-1-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:46:34 +0100
From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: alexandre.chartre@...cle.com
Subject: [PATCH] objtool/x86: objtool can confuse memory and stack access

The encoding of an x86 instruction can include a ModR/M and a SIB
(Scale-Index-Base) byte to describe the addressing mode of the
instruction.

objtool processes all addressing mode with a SIB base of 5 as having
%rbp as the base register. However, a SIB base of 5 means that the
effective address has either no base (if ModR/M mod is zero) or %rbp
as the base (if ModR/M mod is 1 or 2). This can cause objtool to confuse
an absolute address access with a stack operation.

For example, objtool will see the following instruction:

 4c 8b 24 25 e0 ff ff    mov    0xffffffffffffffe0,%r12

as a stack operation (i.e. similar to: mov -0x20(%rbp), %r12).

[Note that this kind of weird absolute address access is added by the
 compiler when using KASAN.]

If this perceived stack operation happens to reference the location
where %r12 was pushed on the stack then the objtool validation will
think that %r12 is being restored and this can cause a stack state
mismatch.

This kind behavior was seen on xfs code, after a minor change (convert
kmem_alloc() to kmalloc()):

>> fs/xfs/xfs.o: warning: objtool: xfs_da_grow_inode_int+0x6c1: stack state mismatch: reg1[12]=-2-48 reg2[12]=-1+0

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402220435.MGN0EV6l-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
---
 tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
index 3a1d80a7878d3..18a9140173326 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
@@ -412,6 +412,14 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct objtool_file *file, const struct section *sec
 		if (!rex_w)
 			break;
 
+		/*
+		 * If the SIB base is 5, and ModRM mod is 0 then there
+		 * is no base. But SIB decoding will set sib_base to
+		 * CFI_BP (register 5).
+		 */
+		if (have_SIB() && sib_base == CFI_BP && modrm_mod == 0)
+			break;
+
 		if (rm_is_mem(CFI_BP)) {
 
 			/* mov disp(%rbp), reg */
-- 
2.39.3


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ