linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: marvell: prestera: allocate dummy net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240329085633.2cfae5e5@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:56:33 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
 edumazet@...gle.com, Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
 quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, kvalo@...nel.org, leon@...nel.org,
 dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: marvell: prestera: allocate dummy
 net_device dynamically

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:52:02 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> -	init_dummy_netdev(&sdma->napi_dev);
> +	sdma->napi_dev = alloc_netdev_dummy(0);
> +	if (!sdma->napi_dev) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "not able to initialize dummy device\n");
> +		goto err_alloc_dummy;
> +	}
> +
>  

duplicated empty line here

> -	netif_napi_add(&sdma->napi_dev, &sdma->rx_napi, prestera_sdma_rx_poll);
> +	netif_napi_add(sdma->napi_dev, &sdma->rx_napi, prestera_sdma_rx_poll);
>  	napi_enable(&sdma->rx_napi);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> +err_alloc_dummy:
> +	prestera_hw_event_handler_unregister(sw, PRESTERA_EVENT_TYPE_RXTX,
> +					     prestera_rxtx_handle_event);
>  err_evt_register:
>  err_tx_init:
>  	prestera_sdma_tx_fini(sdma);
> @@ -682,6 +690,7 @@ static void prestera_sdma_switch_fini(struct prestera_switch *sw)
>  	prestera_sdma_tx_fini(sdma);
>  	prestera_sdma_rx_fini(sdma);
>  	dma_pool_destroy(sdma->desc_pool);
> +	kfree(sdma->napi_dev);

Why kfree()? Let's use free_netdev() consistently, in case one day
we have to undo something alloc_netdev_dummy() has done.