linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix buffer overlow in print_cpu_stall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240329143205.66c35f5f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:32:05 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru>
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Neeraj
 Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>, Joel Fernandes
 <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Boqun Feng
 <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
 rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix buffer overlow in print_cpu_stall_info()

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:56:16 +0300
Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru> wrote:

> Maybe, it would be a good idea for me to add a comment with intent
> clarification, to reduce possibility of the same confusion in the future,

Yes please do.

> while I am at it? If so, should I do it in the same patch, or make a separate one?

I would keep it the same patch, but it really is Paul's decision.

-- Steve