linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix buffer overlow in print_cpu_stall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:21:05 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix buffer overlow in print_cpu_stall_info()

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 02:32:05PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:56:16 +0300
> Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru> wrote:
> 
> > Maybe, it would be a good idea for me to add a comment with intent
> > clarification, to reduce possibility of the same confusion in the future,
> 
> Yes please do.
> 
> > while I am at it? If so, should I do it in the same patch, or make a separate one?
> 
> I would keep it the same patch, but it really is Paul's decision.

I am with Steve on both questions.

								Thanx, Paul