[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a629a8e-5a70-4c7d-ab6a-f4a09e8c574c@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:21:05 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix buffer overlow in print_cpu_stall_info()
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 02:32:05PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:56:16 +0300
> Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@...ud.ru> wrote:
>
> > Maybe, it would be a good idea for me to add a comment with intent
> > clarification, to reduce possibility of the same confusion in the future,
>
> Yes please do.
>
> > while I am at it? If so, should I do it in the same patch, or make a separate one?
>
> I would keep it the same patch, but it really is Paul's decision.
I am with Steve on both questions.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists