linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH 0/0] (proposed?) Add ACPI binding to Rockchip RK3xxx I2C bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240329232528.79332-1-shimmyshai00@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:25:28 -0500
From: Shimrra Shai <shimmyshai00@...il.com>
To: jonathan.cameron@...wei.com
Cc: heiko@...ech.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	max.schwarz@...ine.de,
	niyas.sait@...wei.com,
	shimmyshai00@...il.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/0] (proposed?) Add ACPI binding to Rockchip RK3xxx I2C bus

Hey Jonathan,

I just heard back from the firmware team. Apparently, there is rationale
behind including the clock bindings as part of the _DSD_ - it is because
apparently MS Windows can also run on this platform and it expects those
bindings to be there to configure the clocks on this platform. If they are
changed, it will break that capability, rendering it kind of moot to use
the ACPI boot which is intended to be universal across OSes. (I also wonder
if NetBSD uses the same bindings as well; that OS can boot via ACPI boot
without much issue on this platform.)

Shimrra