linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v19 097/130] KVM: x86: Split core of hypercall emulation to helper function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZgY0hy6Io72yZ9dF@chao-email>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:24:55 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<isaku.yamahata@...il.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	<erdemaktas@...gle.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Sagi Shahar
	<sagis@...gle.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, <chen.bo@...el.com>,
	<hang.yuan@...el.com>, <tina.zhang@...el.com>, Sean Christopherson
	<sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 097/130] KVM: x86: Split core of hypercall emulation
 to helper function

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:26:39AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
>@@ -10162,18 +10151,49 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 
> 		WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->run->hypercall.flags & KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL_MBZ);
> 		vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = complete_hypercall_exit;
>+		/* stat is incremented on completion. */

Perhaps we could use a distinct return value to signal that the request is redirected
to userspace. This way, more cases can be supported, e.g., accesses to MTRR
MSRs, requests to service TDs, etc. And then ...

> 		return 0;
> 	}
> 	default:
> 		ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
> 		break;
> 	}
>+
> out:
>+	++vcpu->stat.hypercalls;
>+	return ret;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_emulate_hypercall);
>+
>+int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>+{
>+	unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
>+	int op_64_bit;
>+	int cpl;
>+
>+	if (kvm_xen_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
>+		return kvm_xen_hypercall(vcpu);
>+
>+	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu))
>+		return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu);
>+
>+	nr = kvm_rax_read(vcpu);
>+	a0 = kvm_rbx_read(vcpu);
>+	a1 = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu);
>+	a2 = kvm_rdx_read(vcpu);
>+	a3 = kvm_rsi_read(vcpu);
>+	op_64_bit = is_64_bit_hypercall(vcpu);
>+	cpl = static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu);
>+
>+	ret = __kvm_emulate_hypercall(vcpu, nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit, cpl);
>+	if (nr == KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE && !ret)
>+		/* MAP_GPA tosses the request to the user space. */

no need to check what the request is. Just checking the return value will suffice.

>+		return 0;
>+
> 	if (!op_64_bit)
> 		ret = (u32)ret;
> 	kvm_rax_write(vcpu, ret);
> 
>-	++vcpu->stat.hypercalls;
> 	return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_hypercall);
>-- 
>2.25.1
>
>