linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support i.MX95 BLK CTL module clock features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:53:39 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support i.MX95 BLK CTL module clock features

On 31/03/2024 14:00, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support i.MX95 BLK CTL module clock
>> features
>>
>> On 24/03/2024 08:51, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>> i.MX95's several MIXes has BLK CTL module which could be used for clk
>>> settings, QoS settings, Misc settings for a MIX. This patchset is to
>>> add the clk feature support, including dt-bindings
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v5:
>>> - Merge bindings except the one has mux-controller
>>> - Separate clock ID headers in a separate patch per Rob's comments
>>
>> Where did he suggest it?
> 
> See https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240315165422.GA1472059-robh@kernel.org/
> 

He said under specific line about one specific define. There is
absolutely nothing about splitting the header into new patch.

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof