linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: support i.MX95 BLK CTL module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:54:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: support i.MX95 BLK CTL module

On 31/03/2024 13:58, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> +    const: 1
>>> +    description:
>>> +      The clock consumer should specify the desired clock by having the
>> clock
>>> +      ID in its "clocks" phandle cell. See
>>> +      include/dt-bindings/clock/nxp,imx95-clock.h
>>
>> In such case, put header as your first patch in the patchset. I don't understand
>> why it was split in the first place...
> 
> Rob gave a comment in v4, so I split the headers.
> "
> If this number can change, then it is not ABI and doesn't go in this 
> header. With that dropped,
> "

Nothing here speaks about splitting headers. Absolutely NOTHING. Rob
commented that you added number which can change, thus this is not a
binding.

Best regards,
Krzysztof