linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support i.MX95 BLK CTL module clock features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 01:32:45 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
	<peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen
 Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
	<festevam@...il.com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support i.MX95 BLK CTL module clock features

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support i.MX95 BLK CTL module clock
> features
> 
> On 31/03/2024 14:00, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add support i.MX95 BLK CTL module clock
> >> features
> >>
> >> On 24/03/2024 08:51, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> >>> i.MX95's several MIXes has BLK CTL module which could be used for
> >>> clk settings, QoS settings, Misc settings for a MIX. This patchset
> >>> is to add the clk feature support, including dt-bindings
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes in v5:
> >>> - Merge bindings except the one has mux-controller
> >>> - Separate clock ID headers in a separate patch per Rob's comments
> >>
> >> Where did he suggest it?
> >
> > See
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore
> > .kernel.org%2Fall%2F20240315165422.GA1472059-
> robh%40kernel.org%2F&data
> >
> =05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C95289dc4bed24c3d125808dc51bc4
> 4e0%7C686
> >
> ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638475116243825697%7
> CUnknown%7
> >
> CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwi
> LCJXV
> >
> CI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Dt6KYhWwp%2B4NSwHJlXwUjyRqYU
> CkN0MvlSOE22w
> > vRE0%3D&reserved=0
> >
> 
> He said under specific line about one specific define. There is absolutely
> nothing about splitting the header into new patch.

I misunderstood your point, I will put the header patch(patch 2/4) as the 1st patch
V6.

Thanks,
Peng.
> 
> NAK
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof