linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Do not build debugfs related code when !CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a063c39-6d2f-43c3-98b3-e4f8c3c6e9c4@ursulin.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:39:36 +0100
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
To: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>,
 Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...lia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Do not build debugfs related code when
 !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS

On 29/03/2024 00:00, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:53 AM Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...lia.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
>>
>> There is no point in compiling in the list and mutex operations which are
>> only used from the dma-buf debugfs code, if debugfs is not compiled in.
>>
>> Put the code in questions behind some kconfig guards and so save some text
>> and maybe even a pointer per object at runtime when not enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
> 
> Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>

Thanks!

How would patches to dma-buf be typically landed? Via what tree I mean? 
drm-misc-next?

Regards,

Tvrtko