linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Do not build debugfs related code when !CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:45:40 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, "T.J. Mercier"
 <tjmercier@...gle.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...lia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Do not build debugfs related code when
 !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS

Am 01.04.24 um 14:39 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
>
> On 29/03/2024 00:00, T.J. Mercier wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:53 AM Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...lia.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
>>>
>>> There is no point in compiling in the list and mutex operations 
>>> which are
>>> only used from the dma-buf debugfs code, if debugfs is not compiled in.
>>>
>>> Put the code in questions behind some kconfig guards and so save 
>>> some text
>>> and maybe even a pointer per object at runtime when not enabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> How would patches to dma-buf be typically landed? Via what tree I 
> mean? drm-misc-next?

That should go through drm-misc-next.

And feel free to add Reviewed-by: Christian König 
<christian.koenig@....com> as well.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko