[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D08TD4LASWJO.30BX8927MB1YK@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:17:50 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <dhowells@...hat.com>, "Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@....de>, "Jason
Gunthorpe" <jgg@...pe.ca>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tpmdd changes for v6.9-rc2
On Sun Mar 31, 2024 at 8:01 PM EEST, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 22:57, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > OK, point taken and it is evolutionary issue really but definitely
> > needs to be fixed.
> >
> > I review and test most of the stuff that goes to keyring but other
> > than trusted keys, I usually pick only few patches every now and
> > then to my tree.
>
> It's perfectly fine if you send me key updates - you're listed as
> maintainer etc, that's not a problem.
>
> But when I get a tag name that says "tpmdd" and a subject that says
> "tpmdd", I'm noty expecting to then see key updates in the pull.
>
> So that part of my issue was literally just that your subject line and
> tag name didn't match the contents, and that just makes me go "there's
> something wrong here".
>
> So keys coming through your tree is fine per se, it's just that I want
> the subject line etc to actually make sense.
>
> Linus
OK, I'll we'll address no problem :-) I think separate tag and
appropriate subject line is sufficient change as we always sync
up with these (through IRC channel), i.e. David is aware when
I send anything keyring specific.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists