lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 06:32:42 +0000
From: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Mark Brown
	<broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Claudiu Beznea
	<Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi
 Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
	<conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "alsa-devel@...a-project.org"
	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, "linux-sound@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>
Subject:
 RE: 回复: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add bindings for Cadence I2S-MC controller

On 30/03/2024 0:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> On 29/03/2024 14:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:42:22PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> >> I stated and I keep my statement that such block is usually not
> >> usable on its own and always needs some sort of quirks or
> >> SoC-specific implementation. At least this is what I saw in other
> >> similar cases, but not exactly I2S.
> >
> > I wouldn't be so pessimistic, especially not for I2S - a good portion
> > of quirks there are extra features rather than things needed for basic
> > operation, a lot of things that might in the past have been quirks for
> > basic operation are these days hidden behind the DT bindings.
> 
> OK, I trust your judgement, so cdns as fallback seems okay, but I don't think it
> warrants cdns as used alone. Not particularly because cdns is different, but
> because we expect specific SoC compatible always.
> 
> Thus if cdns,i2s-mc stays, then:
> 
> items:
>   - enum:
>       - starfive,jh8100-i2s
>   - cdns,i2s-mc
> 

OK, thanks Krzysztof and Mark. I will modify it in next patch.

Best regards,
Xingyu Wu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ