[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef510647-c409-4da6-9cd4-ff4e54cbee74@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:57:14 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-sound@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: cdns: Add drivers of Cadence Multi-Channel I2S Controller
>>
>>> +#define PERIODS_MIN 2
>>> +
>>> +static unsigned int cdns_i2s_pcm_tx(struct cdns_i2s_dev *dev,
>>> + struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime,
>>> + unsigned int tx_ptr, bool *period_elapsed,
>>> + snd_pcm_format_t format)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int period_pos = tx_ptr % runtime->period_size;
>>
>> not following what the modulo is for, usually it's modulo the buffer size?
>
> This is to see if the new data is divisible by period_size and to determine whether
> it is enough for a period_size in the later loop.
That didn't answer to my question, the position is usually between
0..buffer_size.1.
Doing increments on a modulo value then comparisons as done below seems
rather questionable.
>>> +
>>> + iowrite32(data[0], dev->base + CDNS_FIFO_MEM);
>>> + iowrite32(data[1], dev->base + CDNS_FIFO_MEM);
>>> + period_pos++;
>>> + if (++tx_ptr >= runtime->buffer_size)
>>> + tx_ptr = 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + *period_elapsed = period_pos >= runtime->period_size;
>>> + return tx_ptr;
>>> +}
>>> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>>> + if (pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev))
>>> + cdns_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> that sequence looks suspicious.... Why would you suspend immediately during the
>> probe? You're probably missing all the autosuspend stuff?
>
> Since I have enabled clocks before, and the device is in the suspend state after
> pm_runtime_enable(), I need to disable clocks in cdns_i2s_runtime_suspend()
> to match the suspend state.
That is very odd on two counts
a) if you haven't enabled the clocks, why do you need to disbale them?
b) if you do a pm_runtime_enable(), then the branch if
(pm_runtime_enabled) is always true.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "I2S supports %d stereo channels with %s.\n",
>>> + i2s->max_channels, ((i2s->irq < 0) ? "dma" : "interrupt"));
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err:
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int cdns_i2s_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>> + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev))
>>> + cdns_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> ... and this one too. Once you've disabled pm_runtime, checking the status is
>> irrelevant...
>
> I think the clocks need to be always enabled after probe if disable pm_runtime,
> and should be disabled when remove. This will do that.
if you are disabling pm_runtime, then the pm_runtime state becames invalid.
When pm_runtime_disable() is added in remove operations, it's mainly to
prevent the device from suspending.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists