[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62461275-16d6-935f-786a-e602b4b91dde@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:59:56 +0530
From: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
"Jagadeesh Kona" <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik
<quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
"Satya Priya Kakitapalli"
<quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add GPUCC clocks for SM4450
On 3/31/2024 2:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/03/2024 10:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/03/2024 19:28, Ajit Pandey wrote:
>>> Add support for qcom display clock controller bindings
>>> for SM4450 platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>
> Un-reviewed. I did not notice that this was not tested at all.
>
> NAK
>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
> don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
> about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.
>
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
> the process allowing the patch to be tested.
>
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Apologies somehow missed including device tree mailing list, Thanks for
review and suggestion will take care of this in next series.
--
Thanks, and Regards
Ajit
Powered by blists - more mailing lists