lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 16:27:03 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
CC: Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>, Jonathan Cameron
	<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@...el.com>, "Dan
 Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
	<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
	<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] cxl/core: Separate region mode from decoder mode

Dave Jiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/27/24 10:22 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> On Sun, 24 Mar 2024, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@...el.com>
> >>>
> >>> Until now region modes and decoder modes were equivalent in that they
> >>> were either PMEM or RAM.  With the upcoming addition of Dynamic Capacity
> >>> regions (which will represent an array of device regions [better named
> >>> partitions] the index of which could be different on different
> >>> interleaved devices), the mode of an endpoint decoder and a region will
> >>> no longer be equivalent.
> >>>
> >>> Define a new region mode enumeration and adjust the code for it.
> >>
> >> Could this could also be picked up regardless of dcd?
> > 
> > It could but there is no need for it without DCD.
> > 
> > I will work on re-ordering the cleanups if Dave will agree to take them
> > early.
> 
> There's no reason for the change unless it comes with DCD right? And probably no urgent need to taking it ahead then?
> > 

I think I just replied for a 2nd time to this...  yea.

LOL  I have to do better...

Ira

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ