linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ASoC: Use snd_ctl_find_id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <171210056940.279166.10362892119296653551.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:29:29 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: tiwai@...e.com, Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ASoC: Use snd_ctl_find_id_mixer() instead of
 open-coding

On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 10:02:07 +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> The first two patches change snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol() to use the
> core snd_ctl_find_id_mixer() functionality instead of open-coding its
> own list walk.
> 
> The last patch adds a KUnit test for this, which was tested on the
> original and modified code.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] ALSA: control: Introduce snd_ctl_find_id_mixer_locked()
      commit: 08ea486a61451189b190c7b89e406b889cf693fa
[2/3] ASoC: soc-card: Use snd_ctl_find_id_mixer() instead of open-coding
      commit: 897cc72b08374c1224a9ded03c82dfc8e41f80c2
[3/3] ASoC: soc-card: Add KUnit test case for snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol
      commit: ef7784e41db73f3d31ce545227ebba4483479a26

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark