[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4df0a94-be48-464f-892a-7157cb30f034@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:22:04 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: add Siflower Quad SPI
controller
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/03/2024 02:51, Qingfang Deng wrote:
> > Add YAML devicetree bindings for Siflower Quad SPI controller.
> Describe the hardware. What is this Siflower?
That seems like a perfectly adequate description - ${VENDOR} ${FUNCTION}
is normal enough and Quad SPI is a well known standard. We don't need a
marketing spiel for whatever IP version is currently supported.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists