linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] u64_stats: fix u64_stats_init() for lockdep when used repeatedly in one file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iKfMTGyyMB-x74J5bgzhM1RxSvuNhvXyWWv4DO8MZakSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:42:44 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...nel.org, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] u64_stats: fix u64_stats_init() for lockdep when used
 repeatedly in one file

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:40 PM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
Leemhuis) <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>
> Hi. Top-posting for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
>
> Hmmm, looks like Petr's patch for a (minor) 6.8 regression didn't make
> any progress in the past two weeks.
>
> Does nobody care? Did nobody merge it because no tree feels really
> appropriate? Or am I missing something obvious and making a fool out of
> myself by asking these questions? :D

It happens, please resend the patch.