lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKPh0uR2mq4ThokwaF5iJA-N=9sXawi2H=-vLDn5Xfmug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:54:38 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...nel.org, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] u64_stats: fix u64_stats_init() for lockdep when used
 repeatedly in one file

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:42 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:40 PM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> >
> > Hi. Top-posting for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
> >
> > Hmmm, looks like Petr's patch for a (minor) 6.8 regression didn't make
> > any progress in the past two weeks.
> >
> > Does nobody care? Did nobody merge it because no tree feels really
> > appropriate? Or am I missing something obvious and making a fool out of
> > myself by asking these questions? :D
>
> It happens, please resend the patch.

By 'resend' the patch, I meant : sending it to netdev@ mailing list so
that netdev patchwork can see it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ