linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] u64_stats: fix u64_stats_init() for lockdep when used repeatedly in one file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:54:38 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...nel.org, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] u64_stats: fix u64_stats_init() for lockdep when used
 repeatedly in one file

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:42 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:40 PM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) <regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> >
> > Hi. Top-posting for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
> >
> > Hmmm, looks like Petr's patch for a (minor) 6.8 regression didn't make
> > any progress in the past two weeks.
> >
> > Does nobody care? Did nobody merge it because no tree feels really
> > appropriate? Or am I missing something obvious and making a fool out of
> > myself by asking these questions? :D
>
> It happens, please resend the patch.

By 'resend' the patch, I meant : sending it to netdev@ mailing list so
that netdev patchwork can see it.