[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DM6PR04MB6575BEBF605C9095E62F49E3FC3D2@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:24:55 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, "James E . J . Bottomley"
<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions
> On 3/27/24 00:17, Avri Altman wrote:
> > UFS spec version 2.1 was published more than 10 years ago. It is
> > vanishingly unlikely that even there are out there platforms that uses
> > earlier host controllers, let alone that those ancient platforms will
> > ever run a V6.10 kernel. Thus, remove support of host controllers prior
> > to UFS2.1.
>
> According to this website, Pixel 1 devices have a UFSHCI 2.0 controller:
> https://www.gsmarena.com/google_pixel-8346.php. There may be other
> smartphones that have a UFSHCI 2.0 controller. Hence, I'm not sure we
> can drop support for UFSHCI 2.0 controllers from the kernel.
Actually the Pixel 1 is an excellent example why we can and should -
It was announced in 2016, running Android 7 with a v4.4 kernel.
Even if you would be able to find a working specimen of that device -
It is not realistic it would ever run a 6.10 kernel.
Thanks,
Avri
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists