lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 10:59:21 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
    Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, 
    Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, 
    Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, 
    Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, 
    "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>, 
    "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, 
    linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq
 flood

On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> ...
> 
> First of all, please read this
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#backtraces-in-commit-messages
> and amend the commit message accordingly.
> 

Right -- the call chain is described in the commit log message so the 
backtrace does not add value. And the timestamps, stack dump etc. are 
irrelevant.

> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> > Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> > Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
> > Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
> 
> Second, please move these Cc to be after the '---' line
> 

I thought they were placed above the line for audit (and signing) 
purposes. There are thousands of Cc lines in the mainline commit messages 
since v6.8.

> > Link: https://github.com/vivier/qemu-m68k/issues/44
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1078874617.9746.36.camel@gaston/
> 
> Missed Fixes tag?
> 

Would this be ok: Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
I have to ask because some reviewers do not like to see a Fixes tag cite 
that commit.

> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
> > ---
> (here is a good location for Cc:)
> 

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should be 
above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this convention 
changed recently?

Thanks for your review.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ