[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zg0cpzfAl5dHZWlR@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 12:08:55 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Hu <jia-cheng.hu@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jin Qian <jinqian@...roid.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/34] platform: goldfish: remove ACPI_PTR() annotations
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:06:21AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> On platforms without ACPI support, this causes a W=1 warning from gcc when
> the driver is built-in:
>
> drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c:925:36: warning: 'goldfish_pipe_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> 925 | static const struct acpi_device_id goldfish_pipe_acpi_match[] = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> There is no real harm in just keeping the small table around, so rather
> than adding more #ifdef checks, just reference it unconditionally to avoid
> the warning.
With this change you also may replace acpi.h by mod_devicetable.h. Please, also
check all other conversions that you may replace of*.h/acpi.h by a proper one,
i.e. mod_devicetable.h.
When addressed, this one
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists