linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm IPQ9574 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zg0y/pihFpqU3v6m@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:14:14 +0530
From: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC: <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <djakov@...nel.org>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm IPQ9574
 support

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:09:15AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/04/2024 12:34, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_NSSCC	10
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_SNOC_0	11
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_SNOC_1	12
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PCNOC_1	13
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_QOSGEN_REF	14
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_TIMEOUT_REF	15
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_XO_DCD	16
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_ATB		17
> > +#define ICC_MEM_NOC_NSSNOC	18
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_MEMNOC	19
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_MEM_NOC_1	20
> > +
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PPE		0
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PPE_CFG	1
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_NSS_CSR	2
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_IMEM_QSB	3
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_IMEM_AHB	4
> > +
> > +#define MASTER(x)	((ICC_ ## x) * 2)
> > +#define SLAVE(x)	(MASTER(x) + 1)
>
> You already received comment to make your bindings consistent with other
> Qualcomm bindings. Now you repeat the same mistake.
>
> No, that is neither consistent nor greppble.

Sorry. Have restored the naming and posted v7.
Kindly take a look.

Thanks
Varada