| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+MRAg2hKJfG_QUjXu8WHLb+7tpPgMOQv8rfCSmKU2w5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:48:38 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] arm64, bpf: add internal-only MOV instruction to
resolve per-CPU addrs
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 2:17 AM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Support an instruction for resolving absolute addresses of per-CPU
> data from their per-CPU offsets. This instruction is internal-only and
> users are not allowed to use them directly. They will only be used for
> internal inlining optimizations for now between BPF verifier and BPF
> JITs.
>
> Since commit 7158627686f0 ("arm64: percpu: implement optimised pcpu
> access using tpidr_el1"), the per-cpu offset for the CPU is stored in
> the tpidr_el1/2 register of that CPU.
>
> To support this BPF instruction in the ARM64 JIT, the following ARM64
> instructions are emitted:
>
> mov dst, src // Move src to dst, if src != dst
> mrs tmp, tpidr_el1/2 // Move per-cpu offset of the current cpu in tmp.
> add dst, dst, tmp // Add the per cpu offset to the dst.
>
> If CONFIG_SMP is not defined, then nothing is emitted if src == dst, and
> mov dst, src is emitted if dst != src.
>
> To measure the performance improvement provided by this change, the
> benchmark in [1] was used:
>
> Before:
> glob-arr-inc : 23.597 ± 0.012M/s
> arr-inc : 23.173 ± 0.019M/s
> hash-inc : 12.186 ± 0.028M/s
>
> After:
> glob-arr-inc : 23.819 ± 0.034M/s
> arr-inc : 23.285 ± 0.017M/s
> hash-inc : 12.419 ± 0.011M/s
>
> [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/linux/commit/8dec900975ef
You don't see as big of a gain, because bpf_get_smp_processor_id()
is not inlined yet on arm64.
But even without it I expected bigger gains.
Could you do 'perf report' before/after ?
Just want to see what's on top.
>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/lib/insn.c | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> index db1aeacd4cd9..d16d68550c22 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
> @@ -135,6 +135,11 @@ enum aarch64_insn_special_register {
> AARCH64_INSN_SPCLREG_SP_EL2 = 0xF210
> };
>
> +enum aarch64_insn_system_register {
> + AARCH64_INSN_SYSREG_TPIDR_EL1 = 0xC684,
> + AARCH64_INSN_SYSREG_TPIDR_EL2 = 0xE682,
> +};
> +
> enum aarch64_insn_variant {
> AARCH64_INSN_VARIANT_32BIT,
> AARCH64_INSN_VARIANT_64BIT
> @@ -686,6 +691,8 @@ u32 aarch64_insn_gen_cas(enum aarch64_insn_register result,
> }
> #endif
> u32 aarch64_insn_gen_dmb(enum aarch64_insn_mb_type type);
> +u32 aarch64_insn_gen_mrs(enum aarch64_insn_register result,
> + enum aarch64_insn_system_register sysreg);
>
> s32 aarch64_get_branch_offset(u32 insn);
> u32 aarch64_set_branch_offset(u32 insn, s32 offset);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
> index a635ab83fee3..b008a9b46a7f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
> @@ -1515,3 +1515,14 @@ u32 aarch64_insn_gen_dmb(enum aarch64_insn_mb_type type)
>
> return insn;
> }
> +
> +u32 aarch64_insn_gen_mrs(enum aarch64_insn_register result,
> + enum aarch64_insn_system_register sysreg)
> +{
> + u32 insn = aarch64_insn_get_mrs_value();
> +
> + insn &= ~GENMASK(19, 0);
> + insn |= sysreg << 5;
> + return aarch64_insn_encode_register(AARCH64_INSN_REGTYPE_RT,
> + insn, result);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 23b1b34db088..b627ef7188c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -297,4 +297,10 @@
> #define A64_ADR(Rd, offset) \
> aarch64_insn_gen_adr(0, offset, Rd, AARCH64_INSN_ADR_TYPE_ADR)
>
> +/* MRS */
> +#define A64_MRS_TPIDR_EL1(Rt) \
> + aarch64_insn_gen_mrs(Rt, AARCH64_INSN_SYSREG_TPIDR_EL1)
> +#define A64_MRS_TPIDR_EL2(Rt) \
> + aarch64_insn_gen_mrs(Rt, AARCH64_INSN_SYSREG_TPIDR_EL2)
> +
> #endif /* _BPF_JIT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 76b91f36c729..e9ad9f257a18 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -877,6 +877,17 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx,
> emit(A64_ORR(1, tmp, dst, tmp), ctx);
> emit(A64_MOV(1, dst, tmp), ctx);
> break;
> + } else if (insn_is_mov_percpu_addr(insn)) {
> + if (dst != src)
> + emit(A64_MOV(1, dst, src), ctx);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN))
> + emit(A64_MRS_TPIDR_EL2(tmp), ctx);
> + else
> + emit(A64_MRS_TPIDR_EL1(tmp), ctx);
> + emit(A64_ADD(1, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
> +#endif
> + break;
> }
> switch (insn->off) {
> case 0:
> @@ -2527,6 +2538,11 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_arena(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> +bool bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn(void)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> {
> if (prog->jited) {
> --
> 2.40.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists