lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:47:06 +0000
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@...el.com>
To: "intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, "quic_mojha@...cinc.com"
	<quic_mojha@...cinc.com>, "Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] devcoredump: Add dev_coredump_put()

On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 11:36 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 17:48 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 06:39 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > It is useful for modules that do not want to keep coredump available
> > > after its unload.
> > 
> > Why not though? Maybe if this is a common case we should have devm_...
> > coredump functions? Dunno.
> > 
> > Anyway, I'm fine with this, even though I'd like to see a bit more
> > discussion than "do not want". Code looks good.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> 
> Thank you, can you please add this patch to your next pull request? Or should us add it to the next drm/intel-drm pull request?

ping

> 
> Again thank you, just this patch will already unblock some work for us.
> 
> > 
> > johannes
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ