lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 20:22:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 2/4] dt-bindings: stm32: update DT bingding for
 stm32mp25

On 05/04/2024 14:54, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
> 
> On 4/5/24 09:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/04/2024 14:53, gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com wrote:
>>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
>>>
>>> Now RCC driver use '.index' of clk_parent_data struct to define a parent.
>>> The majority of parents are SCMI clocks, then dt-bindings must be fixed.
>>>
>>> Fixes: b5be49db3d47 ("dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform")
>> And except what Rob said, this does not look as a fix. How ABI break
>> could be a fix and what is even to fix here? Please describe the
>> observable bug, how it manifests itself and what is exactly the fix for
>> that bug.
> As I replied to Rob, there are no RCC STM32MP25 drivers already upstreamed.
> 
> However, in my series, the DT binding was merged even though Stephen 
> made some
> 
> important remarks that needed to be taken into account.
> 
> That's why I proposed a fix to update the documentation.
> 
> To be sure, how would you like me to proceed?

You can send v3 and get exactly the same questions. Your commit msg must
answer to all such unusual questions. If maintainer asks something that
you need to explain, it is a hint for you that your commit msg is
inadequate.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ