[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <285f2f64-58b0-4dd0-9f1a-89306a79d572@foss.st.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 14:54:37 +0200
From: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 2/4] dt-bindings: stm32: update DT bingding for
stm32mp25
On 4/5/24 09:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/04/2024 14:53, gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
>>
>> Now RCC driver use '.index' of clk_parent_data struct to define a parent.
>> The majority of parents are SCMI clocks, then dt-bindings must be fixed.
>>
>> Fixes: b5be49db3d47 ("dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform")
> And except what Rob said, this does not look as a fix. How ABI break
> could be a fix and what is even to fix here? Please describe the
> observable bug, how it manifests itself and what is exactly the fix for
> that bug.
As I replied to Rob, there are no RCC STM32MP25 drivers already upstreamed.
However, in my series, the DT binding was merged even though Stephen
made some
important remarks that needed to be taken into account.
That's why I proposed a fix to update the documentation.
To be sure, how would you like me to proceed?
Best Regards,
Gabriel
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists