linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests: Replace "Bail out" with "Error" in ksft_exit_fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:07:53 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests: Replace "Bail out" with "Error" in
 ksft_exit_fail_msg()

On 4/5/24 14:38, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> 
> On 4/6/24 12:36 AM, Bird, Tim wrote:
>> Sorry I didn't catch this on the original submission.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>>>
>>> On 4/5/24 07: 17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > "Bail out! " is not descriptive. It rather should be: "Failed: " and > then this added prefix
>>> doesn't need to be added everywhere. Usually in > the logs, we are searching for "Failed"
>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>>> Caution : This email originated from outside of Sony.
>>> Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please report phishing if unsure.
>>>
>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>>> On 4/5/24 07:17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>> "Bail out! " is not descriptive. It rather should be: "Failed: " and
>>>> then this added prefix doesn't need to be added everywhere. Usually in
>>>> the logs, we are searching for "Failed" or "Error" instead of "Bail
>>>> out" so it must be replace.
>>
>> Bail out! is the wording in the original TAP spec.  We should not change
>> it unless we plan to abandon compatibility with that spec. (which I
>> would advise against).
>>
>> See https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html
> I didn't know that exact words are coming from TAP. Thank you for catching
> it. We don't intend to move away from the spec.
> 
>>
>> The reason "Bail out!" is preferred (IMO) is that it is less likely to be emitted
>> in other test output, and is more 'grepable'.
> Makes sense.
> 
>>
>> This would get a NAK from me.
> Let's drop this series.
> 

Thank you. Dropped now.

thanks,
-- Shuah