linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests: Replace "Bail out" with "Error" in ksft_exit_fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d103fdc2-e7a1-4658-88ab-22929ae48a06@collabora.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:38:06 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 "kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>, Shuah Khan
 <shuah@...nel.org>,
 "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests: Replace "Bail out" with "Error" in
 ksft_exit_fail_msg()

Hi Tim,

On 4/6/24 12:36 AM, Bird, Tim wrote:
> Sorry I didn't catch this on the original submission.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>>
>> On 4/5/24 07: 17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > "Bail out! " is not descriptive. It rather should be: "Failed: " and > then this added prefix
>> doesn't need to be added everywhere. Usually in > the logs, we are searching for "Failed"
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>> Caution : This email originated from outside of Sony.
>> Do not click links or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please report phishing if unsure.
>>
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>> On 4/5/24 07:17, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>> "Bail out! " is not descriptive. It rather should be: "Failed: " and
>>> then this added prefix doesn't need to be added everywhere. Usually in
>>> the logs, we are searching for "Failed" or "Error" instead of "Bail
>>> out" so it must be replace.
> 
> Bail out! is the wording in the original TAP spec.  We should not change
> it unless we plan to abandon compatibility with that spec. (which I
> would advise against).
> 
> See https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html
I didn't know that exact words are coming from TAP. Thank you for catching
it. We don't intend to move away from the spec.

> 
> The reason "Bail out!" is preferred (IMO) is that it is less likely to be emitted
> in other test output, and is more 'grepable'.
Makes sense.

> 
> This would get a NAK from me.
Let's drop this series.

>  -- Tim
> 
>>>
>>> Remove Error/Failed prefixes from all usages as well.
>>>
>>> Muhammad Usama Anjum (2):
>>>    selftests: Replace "Bail out" with "Error"
>>>    selftests: Remove Error/Failed prefix from ksft_exit_fail*() usages
>>>
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/exec/load_address.c   |   8 +-
>>>   .../testing/selftests/exec/recursion-depth.c  |  10 +-
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h           |   2 +-
>>>   .../selftests/mm/map_fixed_noreplace.c        |  24 +--
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/map_populate.c     |   2 +-
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_dontunmap.c |   2 +-
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c    | 166 +++++++++---------
>>>   .../selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c       |   2 +-
>>>   8 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Andrew, Kees,
>>
>> I will apply these to linux-kselftest next as a series since these
>> changes depend on change to tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
>> and need to go together.
>>
>> Are you okay with that?
>>
>> thanks,
>> -- Shuah
>>
> 

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum