lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:54:22 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
CC: <will@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	<linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>, <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
	<andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] perf/hisi_pcie: Avoid placing cpumask on the
 stack

On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 23:59:47 +0800
Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn> wrote:

> In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
> for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
> stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
> 
> Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
> the stack.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ