linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Fix io_cqring_wait() not restoring sigmask on get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cefb820ec1805169d18b3109c47408f5@ispras.ru>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 14:12:15 +0300
From: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@...ras.ru>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, Olivier Langlois
 <olivier@...llion01.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Fix io_cqring_wait() not restoring sigmask on
 get_timespec64() failure

On 2024-04-06 05:06, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/5/24 6:55 AM, Alexey Izbyshev wrote:
>> This bug was introduced in commit 950e79dd7313 ("io_uring: minor
>> io_cqring_wait() optimization"), which was made in preparation for
>> adc8682ec690 ("io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll"). The latter
>> got reverted in cb3182167325 ("Revert "io_uring: Add support for
>> napi_busy_poll""), so simply undo the former as well.
> 
> Thanks - ironically I had to hand apply this one, as some of the
> commits you mention above are not in the base you used for the
> patch...

I used v6.8 as the base, and all three commits mentioned above are 
there. However, the patch indeed doesn't apply to the current tip 
because of post-v6.8 changes, sorry for that!

Thanks,
Alexey