[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42sw4ugekugyqzjylsci6tvw5zfxlwz6ypnetnau6dyqnrqfiq@5jde2w4etpfh>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 20:35:07 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dev_printk: add new dev_errp_probe() helper
Hi Nuno,
..
> +/* Simple helper for dev_err_probe() when ERR_PTR() is to be returned. */
> +#define dev_errp_probe(dev, ___err, fmt, ...) ({ \
> + ERR_PTR(dev_err_probe(dev, ___err, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)); \
> +})
I have a whole series adding a set of error oriente printk's. But
for the time being this looks OK.
I just don't like the name, the 'p' is an important detail, but
a bit hidden... how about dev_err_ptr_probe(...)?
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists