linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: temperature: ltc2983: convert to dev_err

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 20:38:50 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>, 
	Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: temperature: ltc2983: convert to dev_err_probe()

Hi Andy,

On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:18:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:06:24PM +0200, Nuno Sa wrote:
> > Use dev_err_probe() in the probe() path. While at it, made some simple
> > improvements:
> >  * Declare a struct device *dev helper. This also makes the style more
> >    consistent (some places the helper was used and not in other places);
> >  * Explicitly included the err.h and errno.h headers;
> >  * Removed an useless else if();
> >  * Removed some unnecessary line breaks.
> 
> ...
> 
> >  	if (!(thermo->sensor_config & LTC2983_THERMOCOUPLE_DIFF_MASK) &&
> > -	    sensor->chan < LTC2983_DIFFERENTIAL_CHAN_MIN) {
> 
> It's better if you leave {} when the body goes after a single line.
> This applies to your entire series.

I think checkpatch complains if you leave the {...} and,
honestly, I'm not a big fan of the {...}. Unless there is a last
minute rule I missed.

If checkpatch doesn't complain, I'm OK with both ways, though.

Andi